Nothing is isolated, it is mutual.
You have me, I have you, there is no distinction between each other, the main thing is to see from what angle we stand.
If you look at it from my side, then there is only me and not you on your side, that is, if you look at the problem from my opposite side, then there will be only you and not me.
If you look at things this way, then things become isolated, not mutual.
If we treat you and me as a whole and look at things and problems from this perspective, then we are mutual, you have me, I have you, and we have each other Therefore, the controversy between Confucianism and Mohism is unnecessary, and the controversy between Confucianism and Mohism and Zhuzi Baijia is also unnecessary.
Because they are all discussing issues from their own positions and perspectives.
They look at problems from the perspective of people and human beings, and deal with problems.
And they did not look at the problem and deal with it from the perspective of the unity of heaven and earth.
Originally, it was a question of how man and all other things in nature would survive, and how man would survive in nature.
As a result, after Confucianism and Mohism and the hundred schools of thought, it became a question of survival between people.
In this way, whether human civilization has progressed or regressed?
In fact, it is incorrect to look at and deal with problems from the perspective of the unity of heaven and earth, and they are all one-sided and erroneous issues that we are arguing about, or problems of survival.
It is to jump out of the circle of competition between people for the right to live, and into the circle of competition between man and nature for the right to live.
And the real Taoist is to stand on the height of the Tao to look at survival, life and death Isn't the struggle for the right to exist a matter of life and death?
So how do we look at life and death?
How to look at life and death, we must first jump out of the circle of controversy between Confucianism and Mohistism and the hundred schools of thought, and we must also jump out of the circle of the unity of heaven and earth.
We must look at life and death from the height of the Tao, and when we understand the source of life, we can go back and think about life, and it is not too late to think about life and death.
All things in heaven and earth, including the universe, stars, the sun and the moon, all come from the Tao.
They all went through countless times, countless years, and countless changes, and then formed the later universe, stars, sun, moon, heaven and earth, and all things in the heavens and earth.
Man is also one of them, and it has gone through countless times, countless years, and countless changes before finally evolving into the person we are now.
The demise of a species in the face of the Tao does not mean that a species will be completely extinguished once it has perished.
It just means that the species has perished, but it continues to exist in another form.
For example, if a tree is dead, it just means that the tree is dead.
After the tree dies, it still exists in another form, that is, trunk, wood, branches, leaves, roots, etc.
And the trunk, wood, branches, leaves, roots, etc., will they "die" or will they disappear Some people may say that if they are burned, they will "die" or disappear, but in fact, it still does not die or disappear, it is only changing its existence.
After being incinerated, they become smoke, fire, heat, air, gas of some substance, or other forms and substances, and exist, can we say that they are dead?
If we are not convinced, we can continue to divide it, but no matter how we change, it will not completely die or disappear, it will exist in another form Although the original tree no longer exists, it continues to exist in a different form This is the Word The Word is ever-present We can also see from the example of the tree that everything is interconnected, not independently and isolated.
After the tree does not exist, it differentiates into countless forms of existence, existing in other species, or merging with other species and then combining into new species, and so on.
This is the saying of "Fang Sheng", Fang Sheng, Fang Sheng; Only one can not, only one can not; Because it is because it is not, because it is not because it is.
Birth and death means that one thing is born because of the death of another.
For example, timber is born because the tree died.
Death and life refers to the death of one thing and the birth of another.
For example, a tree, the tree dies and wood appears.
It means that it is okay to do this, and it is not okay to have it then.
For example, if Confucianism is considered to be the best, then the Mohist doctrine and the doctrine of the hundred schools of thought are not advisable.
In the same way, if we think that the Mohist doctrine is the best, then the Confucianism and the doctrine of the hundred schools of thought are not advisable.
So which of the doctrines of Confucianism or Mohistism and the hundred schools of thought is correct?
Actually, it's not that difficult to judge As long as we jump out of the controversy between Confucianism and Mohism and the hundred schools of thought, and look at and deal with problems from the height of the unity of heaven and earth and the Tao of Taoism, there is no need for the controversy between Confucianism and Mohism and the hundred schools of thought.
From the perspective of Confucianism and Mohism, as well as the hundred schools of thought, what is being debated is only survival, and it is the struggle for the right to survive between people.
Looking at the problem from the perspective of the unity of heaven and earth, we human beings, like all things in nature, are just one species.
What we are fighting for is the right to live with all things in nature.
And standing on the height of the Tao to look at the problem, we will live and die, and we will always exist in a material form, we are the Tao, and I have gained eternal life.
If this method is not possible, and this is not possible, then it is absolutely okay to change to another method and another form.
Everything is useful, everyone does their best, and there is a place and time to play their role.
For example, when Confucianism, Mohism, and the Hundred Schools of Thought do not solve the problem of human existence, why don't we work together to find the root of the problem, or we must hold on to Confucianism or Mohistism or the Hundred Schools of Thought When Confucianism or Mohism or the hundred schools of thought cannot save the common people of mankind, why don't we give up and look for the correct doctrine and ideas that can save the common people?
Free novels bring you joy and joy ---> storyskyline.net
Because it is because it is not, because it is not because it is.
To admit this thing is to deny the other; Acknowledging the other, that is, acknowledging the thing, must have a reason.
For example, if there is wood, there will be no tree, and there will be wood because there is a tree, and wood will come because of the tree aa2705221: