You have a new Amazon product recommendation

Chapter 22 Zhuangzi's "Theory of Things" Vernacular Text II


Ordinary people get along with people, society, and all things in nature based on their own past experience or other people's ways of dealing with the world.

Our own past experience and the experience of others are our teachers This teacher is called "Chengxin", which can also be said to be prejudice or prejudice or prejudice, which is a fixed standard for judging things in our minds, and thinking that it is correct We all have a teacher like this, and we all like to judge things by a fixed standard of judging things, and think that they are correct Why do we have such teachers?

Why do we have a heart?

Because that's what we were taught to do when we were young, because the circumstances in which we live give us the same feelings.

We are educated, we identify with other people's experiences, and we form our own opinions, which is the source of our minds, or prejudices Ignorant people will be like us, do they have a successful mindThe answer is yes: all of us have a successful mind, and all of us have such a teacher.

Therefore, often before something is born, we have a judgment, a guess, and a countermeasure.

We imagine something and then judge, analyze, guess, and so on.

And then there was a way to deal with it.

This is the fault of the heart Since we have a heart, we have made something out of nothing, and we have a dream, so we have a dream, and we draw a big pie, so that those who want to eat the big cake are full of hope for the future.

It's like going to Yue today and arriving yesterday.

Why did we go to Yue Guo yesterday, because yesterday our hearts have gone, and our hearts have gone.

We have richly imagined the country of Vietnam, imagining n n possible and n scenes. nn all sorts of situations.

This is the fault of the heart, and the absence is regarded as being.

If there is no, there is, what is the truth of this, even if Shengming Dayu is alive, I am afraid it is impossible to explain it clearly.

And how can I explain these truths clearly, so that the world can understand the dangers of becoming a mind?

The sound of human speech is not like the sound of the wind blowing the holes, the sound of the wind blowing the holes is just a sound, but the sound of the human voice is endowed with rich content.

The voice of a discerning person has a rich content.

What they say is informative, but there is no final conclusion.

The words they speak are like the footwraps of the princess, they are long and smelly, and they are endless, so what these people say is not credible.

Did they say something, but in fact, what they said was the same as not saying it.

Did they really say anything, in fact, what they said was the same as not saying it.

But they don't admit it, thinking that they say a lot of truth and so on.

They don't admit it the same: they speak differently than the chirps of chicks.

Isn't the chirping of a chick a sound coming out of the mouth of a chick, and the sound of a person speaking is a sound coming out of a person's mouth If it makes sense that human voices are sounds, then the sounds from the mouths of chicks are also sounds, and there are many truths in them.

So their voices of speech, debate, singing, and so on are like the chirping of chicks.

How is the Taoist Tao misunderstood?

Since the Taoist Tao was misunderstood, the Taoist Tao has become unrecognizable.

This person also said that he was a Taoist, and that person also said that he was a Taoist.

This person said that the family does nothing, that person says that the family is passive and avoids the world, and some people say that the family affects the social exhibition, and wants to return mankind to the age of ignorance.

These people claim to be Taoists, or that they understand Taoism.

In fact, they are not true Taoists, they are pseudo-Taoists, they are academic spies, and they are deliberately misinterpreting Taoists.

They deliberately misinterpret the purpose of Taoism Their purpose is obviously to highlight that their own academic views are correct and that other academic views are wrong and are all cancers of mankind that should be eradicated.

How can the language of human communication have right and wrong?

The sound that comes out of the human mouth is actually just a sound like the chirping of a chick, like the neighing of a wild beast, and like the sound of the earth.

But since human beings have spiritual wisdom, there is right and wrong, there is Confucianism and Mohist thought, and there is everything.

The Taoist doctrine of Taoism and Taoism was recognized by most wise people in the past, but now it has been misunderstood and abandoned by many people Language, which was originally just a tool for human communication, now gives it right and wrong.

And you must distinguish between right and wrong Here's why: Taoism and Taoism have been misunderstood, misled by the rhetoric of some people.

Language was originally just a tool for human communication, but now it is whitewashed by flowery words, and it sounds much better.

People are chasing flowery rhetoric and forgetting the essence of language.

Therefore, there is a debate between Confucianism and Mohistism.

What is the debate between Confucianism and Mohistism?

In fact, it is: affirm what the other person denies, and deny what the other person affirms.

In fact, the debate between Confucianism and Mohists about right and wrong is just deliberately making things difficult for each other and highlighting themselves.

In fact, neither side is talking about substantive issues, but is only whitewashing themselves.

In fact, whether they argue or not, it is not good for the world.

Free novels bring you joy and joy ---> storyskyline.net

How to judge what Confucianism and Mohists think is wrong and wrong, whether it is really wrong and wrong, how to judge what Confucianism and Mohists think is right and yes, whether it is true is right and yes In fact, it is very simple, we can first look at the problem from the standpoint of Confucianism or Mohistism, look at Mohism from the standpoint of Confucianism, and then look at Confucianism from the standpoint of Mohist.

In this way, we can see the essence of Confucianism and Mohistism If this is not possible, then we should jump out of the circle of Confucianism and Mohistism, and make judgments from the perspective and height of human beings and human beings.

If this is not enough, then we should jump out of the circle of human beings and human beings, and make judgments from the perspective and height of the unity of heaven and earth In fact, what Confucianism and Mohists are arguing about is for the better survival of human beings.

In fact, man, like everything in nature, is just a species in nature.

From the perspective of Confucianism and Mohistism, what is being debated is only the question of human survival and human society.

From the perspective of the unity of heaven and earth, what is being debated is only the question of the survival of man and all things.

Standing on the height of the Tao, we will understand life and life and death If we still can't understand life, let's analyze it again: