Second update today June 1, 1942, AD 2783.
Hanking, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
"Facts have proved that the Hindustan army of Orissa has committed extremely serious crimes in Bangladesh.
This is anti-civilization and anti-humanity.
Such behavior has completely violated the minimum moral bottom line of mankind.
This is a disservice to the entire civilized world.
This crime is intolerable."
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhou Changyun sternly condemned the atrocities committed by the Indian armed forces.
In front of reporters from various media, he first showed a large number of photos and videos, as well as interrogation records and victim testimonies.
It proves that the Indian army has committed crimes in Bangladesh such as large-scale massacres, large-scale rapes, and raping civilian girls to serve as comfort women.
The evidence is irrefutable and cannot be washed away at all.
"Excuse me, Mr.
Spokesperson, can we interview the victim?"
a French female reporter asked.
Zhou Changyun said: "Of course you can, but you must obtain their consent, and in order to protect the privacy of the victims, their real names are not allowed to be reported."
"Mr.
Spokesperson, how does China plan to deal with those Indian officers and soldiers who committed crimes?"
an American reporter asked.
"We will organize a special court of the People's Revolutionary League to conduct a public trial of these Indian officers and soldiers who committed crimes.
The judges of the special court will be composed of professional judges sent by all countries participating in peacekeeping operations.
The court will sentence all criminals in accordance with Chinese law , let them get the punishment they deserve," Zhou Changyun replied.
The American reporter said: "This is wrong.
These people belong to the Orissa Autonomous State, and the victims are not Chinese citizens, so even if they did commit crimes, China does not have the power to try them.
China tried a group of Orissa people, This is a violation of the sovereignty of Orissa Autonomous State.”
Zhou Changyun smiled and said: "Mr. reporter, what you said is not correct.
Let me ask you a question first.
If we were in the United States, would the actions of these Indian officers and soldiers be considered good deeds?"
"Of course we, the United States, are not a just country.
The behavior of these Indians is a serious crime, but" the American reporter said quickly.
He will not commit such politically correct issues.
Besides, the United States is a puritanical country, and the activities of the Asans are definitely against the mainstream American values.
However, this matter has nothing to do with them, so naturally they will not issue any condemnation.
But they dare not deny the nature of the behavior itself.
Zhou Changyun interrupted him and asked other reporters: "Well, we already know the views of this American reporter.
He believes that the behavior of these Indian officers and soldiers is a serious crime according to the standards of American society.
So other gentlemen and Madam, do you have any objection to the evil nature of this matter?”
What else is there to say?
Any normal country would not consider rape, massacre, forced comfort women, etc. to be a good thing.
Even the European and American powers often do this kind of thing, but at least on the surface, they cannot admit that this kind of thing is good.
This is a kind of political correctness in a broad sense.
Many things can be done in private, but they cannot be talked about, let alone others.
Because no government with a passing IQ would consider itself "evil".
Naturally, it is impossible for this group of reporters to violate mainstream values on this issue and approve of the behavior of Indians.
Otherwise, let’s not talk about whether it will be effective.
If the country finds out, it will be sprayed to death by the citizens if not the government.
Free novels bring you joy and joy ---> storyskyline.net
You dare to say that our country is evil.
It would be weird if we don’t kill you.
Even if they are dissatisfied with China's actions now, they can only hold their noses and say: These Asans are just bad.
The standard used by the gangsters in this era to judge whether something is bad is similar to the drow society in DND, that is, "a crime that is not caught is not a crime."
If you don't get caught, then you are free to do whatever you want to the victim; but if you get caught, then consider yourself unlucky.
Of course, there is also a question of strength comparison here.
If the criminal is stronger than the one who is fighting the injustice, he will be disgraced at most, and he may be able to fight back.
If the two sides are equally powerful, there will be a fight.
But what if the person who fights against injustice is stronger, or the kind of strong person who can torture criminals with one hand?
And this strong person wants to find a role model to establish his power and gain reputation.
Then it will be difficult for this criminal to die even if he wants to.
This group of Hindustani people in Orissa are so unlucky.
They committed a lot of bad things that violate mainstream human values and were caught by China, a powerful and defiant powerhouse.
China also needs to catch a role model.
Come to establish your authority and gain reputation.
So they were in a tragedy.
They couldn't even find anyone to speak for them.
Even Britain, a nominal sovereign state, didn't dare to speak out against this issue.
Just kidding, after all, Bangladesh, which Asan is causing harm to, is also their Commonwealth country.
Since they are all "our own people," even if they try to sidestep the situation, they can't go too far.
However, the American reporter was still unconvinced and continued: "Mr.
Spokesperson, I still think that China's actions are illegal.
Even if these Indians are to be tried, it should be done by the Orissa Autonomous State or the injured party, Bangladesh."
The matter of the autonomous state should not be handled by China, because this is an infringement of the sovereignty of the autonomous state of Orissa."
Zhou Changyun smiled: "First of all, this has nothing to do with nationality.
We are safeguarding international justice and safeguarding the most basic rights of human beings.
We have always believed that safeguarding human rights is a universal truth in the world, and human rights should be higher than sovereignty.
Is it true that in the United States?
, will he indulge in such evil behavior?
Secondly, this is not China’s trial against him, but the entire People’s Revolutionary League country.”
Then Zhou Changyun changed his serious expression and said: "As early as last year, our country has repeatedly called for attention to the chaotic situation in the Indian subcontinent at the League of Nations, and submitted memorandums to various major powers, asking them to take responsibility, especially the United Kingdom.
Stop the humanitarian disaster there.
But unfortunately, our calls have gone unanswered."
He changed his tone: "Of course, we also understand the lack of timely response from the European and American powers.
After all, they are all at war.
However, the continued unrest in the subcontinent has not only caused a large number of humanitarian disasters, but will also inevitably endanger the security of neighboring countries.
Security, so it must be stopped.
Since major countries are unable to care about the problems of the subcontinent, China, as a responsible big country, will certainly not give in. " The European and American reporters were choked by him and looked at each other speechless.
Later, this press conference became Zhou Changyun's personal performance.
He used his eloquent tongue to tout China's peacekeeping operation into a great humanitarian rescue operation.
In order to protect the lives and property of ordinary people, the elderly, the weak, women and children, to maintain world peace, and to protect the earth from destruction, the countries of the People's Revolutionary League headed by China have traveled thousands of miles and carried out this mission with a strong spirit of dedication.
A great act to maintain peace in the subcontinent.
In short, it is a purpose.
China is great, glorious, and just.
Anyone who opposes this operation and puts up obstacles to this operation must be evil and bad guys.
Free novels bring you joy and joy ---> storyskyline.net
In fact, Wen Desi would set up this memorial arch, that is, to dress up China as a kind and peace-loving country, so as to reduce its threat in the eyes of other countries in the world, and to establish China as a great and upright image, such as human beings.
Hope, Earth role model, whatever.
Otherwise, it will have a negative impact on China's world strategy.
Challenging the whole world alone sounds very formidable.
With China's current strength, it can challenge the whole world alone, but in practice, it is not an easy task.
Let’s not talk about how much money it would cost to do such a thing and how many people would die, but so what if all the world’s powers were involved?
Wen Desi would never do such stupid things as "unify the world", and he was not the kind of brainless middle schooler.
Anyone with a normal IQ can imagine: If the whole world becomes China, then it means that we have to feed people all over the world.
Wen Desi has never been an internationalist, and he does not have such noble sentiments.
The happy life of the Chinese people now is based on the exploitation of the whole world.
Although China's "exploitation" appears to be more subtle and gentle than that of Europe, its essence is still exploitation.
By relying on the scissor difference to purchase foreign industrial and agricultural raw materials at low prices, and then selling them processed industrial products, the difference in added value between raw materials and finished products goes without saying.
Then there are various high-tech products with monopoly properties.
The sale of these things in foreign countries is a kind of exploitation.
If they were all from the same country, you would at least have equal access to water.
Without the distinction of country, this kind of exploitation would be impossible.
There is also welfare.
China's current social welfare system is very high.
Although it cannot compare with the high welfare countries in northern Europe in later generations, it is first-rate in the current world.
There are now more than 900 million people in China and more than 1.9 billion people in the world.
If we feed all the people in the world, we will almost double the number of people we need to feed.
Coupled with the inability to exploit, it will inevitably lead to a decline in the living standards of the people.
This decline is very obvious.
Needless to say, I am thankful to be able to guarantee the current three achievements.
No one with normal intelligence would do this kind of thing.
In the later generations of the original time and space, Mexico once voluntarily merged with the United States, but the United States rejected this "fat meat delivered to the door" because of this consideration.
The United States doesn't even do anything to feed tens of millions more people.
Could it be that Mr.
Wen is stupid enough to do something to feed hundreds of millions more people?
For example, if you open a company, are you willing to share the profits equally with the workers?
Or, in other words, a wealthy family is willing to let a group of strangers become family members and live a peaceful life.
Would he live the same life as himself?
Or, would he use his own money to support the poor?
Obviously, it is certain that 99,999 people would not be willing to do so.
Therefore, "unifying the world" is something that has no benefit other than satisfying the vanity of the middle school students.
Wen Desi will never do it.
He's not that unconventional
.
: